Saturday, December 25, 2010

Anne Summers boss in AA Milne grooming mystery

Speak roughly to your little boy,
And beat him when he sneezes;
He only does it to annoy,
Because he knows it teases.

As Tim has pointed out, this is more than a little strange,
A Surrey police spokeswoman confirmed that Cox from East Grinstead, West Sussex, was charged on December 17 with three counts of administering poison with intent to annoy.

Friday, December 24, 2010

Too right wing to be a teacher, have you tried being a Conservative MP?

Having been fired for speaking out as right of centre on education, Katharine Birbalsingh is trying to find work,
‘You’ve done the unthinkable in education: you’ve sided with the Right. No one is going to touch you. No local authority, no set of governors, no head.
The educational employment consultant then goes on to tell her that she could do like bad teachers do, hide for a while and pop up later,
Failed heads who have been pushed out manage to get other headships once they’ve reinvented themselves, and so you might be able to do the same thing
The interview continued,
Hunter smiles, pushing my CV to one side. He leans towards me. ‘Have you ever thought of becoming a Conservative MP?’
I draw my eyebrows together, baffled. ‘Sorry? But I don’t want to be a politician. I’m here to talk to you about teaching. I’m a teacher! And I want a job back in the inner city!’
Hunter pulls the CV back in front of him. ‘OK then, so like I was saying, the first step is to stay quiet and to try to reinvent yourself. Play the game. Maybe then you’ll be in with a chance…’
I shake my head vigorously. ‘No I tell you! I mean, wherever I went to work I would never say anything about that particular school. I would never let anyone know what was really happening within. But I cannot stay quiet about the system. I just can’t do it!’
Hunter sighs, moving my CV to the side again. ‘Yes, well, like I was saying… Have you ever thought about becoming a Conservative MP?’
Stories like this make me want to be like Lizzie Borden and take an axe to the while educational establishment

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Farage at the IEA

Via Dick

Leaf it out

As you may or may not be aware, Portugal has a few financial problems. So now would be the perfect time for the Prime Minister to do something really stupid.

Like this for example,
The Prime Minister of Portugal, Jose Socrates, has become the first head of state in the world to adopt an all-electric vehicle for official matters. On Wednesday, Portugal received delivery of the first 10 Nissan Leaf EVs to be offered in Europe, as recognition of the country's pioneering work in the electric mobility field with the MOBI.E Programme. One of those cars landing in the hands of Mr. Socrates, who will now travel exclusively by Electric Car (it was not disclosed if the Leaf would be the only EV in the fleet) for his official travels around the capital city of Portugal, Lisbon.


Now in order to allow this great plan to happen,
(1) EVs are fully exempt from both the Vehicle Tax due upon purchase (Imposto Sobre Veículos) and the annual Circulation Tax (Imposto Único de Circulação); (2) Personal Income Tax provides an allowance of EUR 803 upon the purchase of EVs; (3) EVs are fully exempt from the 5%-10% company car tax rates which are part of the Corporation Income Tax; (4) The Budget Law provides for an increase of the depreciation costs related to the purchase of EVs for the purpose of Corporation Income Tax; (5) the first 5,000 EVs to be sold in Portugal will receive a 5,000€ incentive fund, and the Cash-for-Clunkers program grants an additional 1,500€ fund if a internal combustion engine vehicle built before 2000 is delivered when acquiring the new EV; (6) The Portuguese State did also commit to play a pedagogic role and defined that EVs will have a 20% share of the annual renewal of public car fleet, starting in 2011.

So of course it isn't costing the taxpayer a bean. After all it had better not as the country is broke.


Respect and Obey Authority



Due to The Dude I saw this,

And I am now very frightened

Labour spots a problem

But of course they see the ripple, not the wave,
Ivan Lewis MP, Labour’s Shadow Culture, Media and Sport Secretary, commenting on speculation that former Conservative MP, Chris Patten, is set to chair the BBC Trust, said:

“We note the rumours which are circulating about favoured candidates for the chairmanship of the BBC Trust.

“At a time when the independence of the BBC is threatened by the ill concealed hostility of David Cameron and Jeremy Hunt, it is essential that the new chairman is above accusations of political bias.

“If the Conservative led government is serious about new politics, no appointment should be confirmed until the favoured candidate is scrutinised by the DCMS Select Committee.”
As I have pointed out before it is not his Tory Party affiliation that is the problem, that is after all above board and widely proclaimed and known, and will thus be easy to spot, but it is the fact that he has a pension from the EU, a pension which he could loose if he does anything that the Comission decide is harmfuil to the interests of the EU that is the problem.

Looking at the Government's attitude to this I see no desire to ensure openess,
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UKIP)
To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they will ensure that no one in receipt of a forfeitable pension from the European Union is appointed as chairman or a trustee of the BBC.
Baroness Rawlings (Whip, House of Lords; Conservative)
Ministerial appointments to the BBC Trust are made on merit under a fair, open and transparent process which is regulated by the Commissioner for Public Appointments. Applications are assessed against the specific selection criteria advertised in relation to a position as and when it falls vacant.


"Christmas trees could present a danger"



I came across this through the good offices of th Norwich Evening News, and my favourite twitterer, http://twitter.com/EveningNews

Written up by the splendidly Christmassy David Freezer, it is a tale of fear and horror...

A dramatic video of how quickly a Christmas tree fire can be spread has been released to warn people to not allow tragedy to strike in their home this Christmas.
Scary it is too.

But I had a look at the statistics, and I noted that in Norfolk - Oh yes the Department of Communities and LocalGovernent had obviously done thir work and have press released tis little fear mongering across the country, county by county - in Norfolk,

Statistics from last year show that of the 429 domestic fires in Norfolk, December was one of the busiest months for firefighters with a total of 46.
Well that would mean that the aveage per month in Norfolk was 35. So December with 46 is bad, but not that bad, and given that we are all turning up the heating, having fires at home and so on, hardly surprising.

I note that,
Statistics show that of the 595 domestic fires in Hertfordshire during 2009, 64 took place in December. Across the border in Essex, 82 of the 803 blazes in the county occurred during the last month of the year.
See what I mean about localised press releases...

Furthermore
The Government’s Chief Fire and Rescue Adviser Sir Ken Knight said: “Everyone enjoys the festive cheer that a Christmas tree and decorations can bring to a home. But the sad fact is that all this can act as extra fuel for a potential house fire. Unsafe electrical decorations, overloaded plugs and unattended candles are all potential causes of fire.

“Just two to three breaths of toxic smoke from a fire can render a person unconscious and you have less time to escape than you think. It only takes a minute for festive celebrations to go up in smoke, so I urge everyone to be fire safe this year and have a great Christmas.”

Dry Christmas trees, decorations and wrapped presents can all provide means for a fire to spread in the home so Fire Kills have issued a list of precautions to take, as well as reminded people to test their fire alarms as soon as possible.
I don't know, call me a cynic but I just wanted to check on those statistics. After all burning Christmas trees are scary things, just look at that video.

So on the department website we find this,
Notes to editors
Provisional statistics show that nearly 2000 fires were caused by electric heaters, electric blankets and candles in 2009/10. Figures will be verified upon publication of Fire Statistics UK during Summer 2011.


Don't let your Christmas go up in smoke. Dry Christmas trees, decorations and wrapped presents can all provide means for a fire to spread in the home.
Hmm... Thinks I, no mention of Christmas trees in the Statistics. So I do what any journalist should do and check. I phoned the Deprtament of Communities;and Local Government and asked if they had any statistics relating to Christmas Tree Fires? After all they were trying to scare us about the dangers of Christmas trees.

They phoned back,
"No", the friendly lass said, "We have no statistics on Christmas tree fires".
"Decorations, statistics on the effect of decorations?"
"No"
"So why are you sending out scary press releases and making scary films about the dangers of Christmas trees when you have no data to back it up?
"
"Well Christmas trees could present a danger" She said, slightly hesitantly.
Christmas trees could present a danger, so can books for Pete's sake - Do you put out warnings during the Hay Festival? Excess books could result in congflagration!
"We do the same at Diwali".
"OK, so it is alright to scare people of all faiths, without any evidence to back it up?"
She started to go on like some sort of bit part in a CSI film about dry trees being an accelerant (which makes me wonder if the very fast burning tree in the film is bone dry, the sort that got chucked out a couple of weeks ago).

I pushed again, after all, we have the Government trying to make our flesh creep. Yes of course Christmas trees and paper and electric lights and candles (and Christmas puddings - don't forget the Christmas puddings) are flamable. We know that.

I scoffed again, and getting increasingly annoyed with me she answered,
"The Government has an important role in public information".
Well maybe, but not without any evidence to back it up you don't.

Just for the record Madam, and Bob Neil the Minister implicated in this.

We are not stupid, you can stop spending money telling uis things we know about now.

The Ghost of Christmas present



How dare this country criticise others on human rights.

Dick Puddlecote directs me to this video, it is harrowing.

The scene a man and his son at home.

Enter the three wise men (with a social worker).

If you don't come quietly then we will handcuff the child.

The child obviously has no intention of going.

Now of course I have no idea of the rights and wrongs of this specific case. But it is apparant that the child isn't being coerced to stay.

When two officers force him to the ground to cuff him, one of the police, before knocking the camera to the ground attempts to block the father from filming the scene by waving his sheet of paper which gives him authority.

Of course this is done for the good of the child now, isn't it.

Chris Booker has been highlighting this issue now for months.

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Nobody wants to meet Nick

Nick Clegg did Oldham today, and then some. He arrived at the Oldham Training Centre today en force. Lees Road was blocked for his very important Deputy Prime Minstership.

He was accompanied by,
7 Police cars 
3 Cars of security detail
1 Car full of close personal staff,
and of course 
The Deputy Prime Ministerial Limo.
One of the UKIP by-election team turned up to see if they could go into the meeting. One of the phalanx of policemen politely turned them away,
"It's a public meeting, but only those invited can go. There again there are only 15 people in there who accepted the invitations".
It transpires that the Lib Dems had invited everybody involved in the training centre to attend, but only 15 people bothered to turn up. But he was surrounded by twice as many security staff.

Nobody wants  to be seen with Nick any more.


Desperate PR puff for Christmas

This just in,
WHAT THE DOCTOR ORDERED THIS CHRISTMAS:
GLASS PICKLE JARS AND BOTTLES OF FIZZ!

Yes its those friendly folk from the Glass industry telling us how wonderful they are.


Aaaaargh

Is Hungary fit to hold the European Council Presidency.

I know, I don't want any country to hold the Presidency of the European Council. I don't want there to be an European Council. But it exists and what it does matters, so the passage last night of its new media law should concern us all. After all these chaps will, for the next 6 months have a serious influence on leglisation and our lives.

The law sets up a new organisation, the National Media and Communications Authority (NMHH) which will according to the WSJ
expand the state’s power to monitor and penalize private media, allowing a media regulator appointed by the ruling party to fine journalists if coverage is deemed unbalanced.
The law covers broadcasters, newspapers, weeklies and news websites.
The council handpicked by the ruling party will have the power to fine television and radio stations as much as 200 million forints (about €700,000) for coverage deemed politically out of balance. Maximum fines for national newspapers and websites were set at 25 million forints and for weeklies at 10 million forints.

The Media Council will also have the right to access documents before publication. Journalists will have to disclose their sources on matters of national security, the parliament decided Tuesday.
But according to reports it is so badly, and broadly drafted that it may even have similar powers over blogs. How they plan to police this is a different matter. But it might explain why their presidency blog doesn't allow comments. If it did and they were critical their own blog may fall foul of their law.


Moneyball on the hoof

Possibly the worst Christmas present ever concieved, the most humourless politician in Britain has released an iphone app.


So go on, download it if you dare, there you will learn how dreadfull anybody is who has a life


The delights you will find there include,
The International Federation of Actors (FIA) has produced a handbook ’Good Practices to Combat Gender Stereotypes and Promote Equal Opportunities in Film, Television and Theatre in Europe’.

Yes an attempt to stop pretty women getting roles in the acting profession
 
An attack on the Ryanair Calendar.
 Ryanair has again done the dirty in a desperate bid for profits and pimped out its “sexiest” airline stewards in a “bare all” calendar.

Like Michael O'Leary needs the calendar to get profits.

And so on and so forth

Another Crack in the Edifice?

Vihar Georgiev over at he EU Law Blog has written an interesting post about how Germany and France are blocking the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to Schengen.

He and I differ on one aspect, that is he is minded to belive the political eleite when it jusdged thjose benighted countries fir to join the EU in 2007,
The first question is whether Bulgaria and Romania were fit to become Member States in 2007. The European Commission believed so, and so did France and Germany at the time. However, this leads to the logical conclusion that both countries in fact experienced a deterioration of the rule of law since accession.
I feel that the political elite would have allowed nothing to get in the way of enlargement, to ensure that the EU continued to ensure its borders spread, in the words of the famous sonmg 'wider still and wider'. To me their belief that the Copenhagen Criteria had been met was a fiction, facts could not be allowed to get in the way of the EU's desires. This is analogous to the way inwhich the Greeks were allowed into the Eiurozone when everybody knew they were cooking their books.

He is absolutely right however to highlight one aspect of the story though,
The second question is whether Bulgaria and Romania can actually, at any point in the future, join the Schengen area. This is not an absurd question, since if separate Member States reaffirm their right of individual assessment of the quality of the judicial systems of candidates, it may turn out that both Bulgaria and Romania are assessed against unachievable standards that surpass the present level of rule of law in the Schengen area. Again, this is a logically derived possibility.

France and Germany should understand that answering both questions will have its consequences for the level of solidarity and cohesion in the European Union.
Merkle and Sarkozy have in this instance decided to play to the Gallery at home, rather than to pay obiescience to the faith of 'Europe'. By rejecting the communitaire method over this, they are driving a wedge into one of the European Union's cracks. What the ongoing rammifications of this will be remains to be seen, but I think that a canary in the mineshaft just keeled over and died.

Update
I note that the Romaian President has taken umbrage about this, big time,
Traian Basescu, Romania’s president, acknowledged problems with Romania’s judiciary and the need to speed up administrative reforms.
But he told reporters at the presidential palace that Romania had met all technical conditions for entry and argued that the introduction of new conditions would breach European law and create “an unacceptable precedent”.
“We will not accept discrimination from anybody, even from the EU’s most powerful states, Mr Basescu said.
And as the FT points out elsewhere, the issue is big on the Hungarian agenda, so things could get a little sticky.
Because the issue could get even hotter, especially since the incoming Hungarian presidency had made Bulgarian and Romanian Schengen membership such a priority

The Big Society - In action

Here is a story that encapsulates the Big Society, and what it can and should be about. It dates from 2006, but you will be pleased to know that it continues to date.

It concerns one Bennet Levin "native Philly guy, self-made millionaire". One of the interesting things about Mr Levin is that he owns some train carriages - in his case some luxury Pullman style train carriages with serious historical background.

He came up with the idea of transporting war wounded from their hospital, the US version of Selly Oak, to the big Army v Navy Football match.

He then got in touch with other private owners of Luxury Pullman carriages, ( a clsoe knit community I guess) and put the whole shebang together. You haven't heard of this because of his very basic, and thoughroughly maintained rule,
No press on the trip, lest the soldiers' day of pampering devolve into a media circus.

No politicians either, because, says Bennett, "I didn't want some idiot making this trip into a campaign photo op"

And no Pentagon suits onboard, otherwise the soldiers would be too busy saluting superiors to relax.
It is a warming tale.

Can you imagine trying to do that here in the UK, the insurance the pettifogging, the annoyance that 'can't be done' misery, the CRB checks god alone knows what.

If the Government really want the small battalions to operate, if it really wants the 'big society' to work, it should re-jig - repeal (thanks Spartacus) legislation to allow this sort of thing to happen.

If it does, the imagination and generosity of the people of the country will surprise us all. If it doesn't we will continue down the route that allowed this to happen. Do you remember when taxi drivers gave time and money to take disadvantaged children to the seaside? Do you know why it stopped?
Child protection laws and red tape have ended more than 50 years of trips to the seaside for Manchester's children.
The city's taxi drivers are ending their annual day trip to Blackpool for the city's disadvantaged youngsters.

The balloon festooned cavalcade began in 1949 when a cabbie was asked to show blind passengers around Manchester.

But a lack of support, child protection checks and health and safety rules have forced organisers of the annual ride to wind up their charity.

At its height the convoy of taxis attracted more than 100 cabs carrying 200 plus children and attracted a great deal of attention as it headed to Blackpool Pleasure Beach.

Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Whilst salt runs out, the LGA announces a new Conference

The country is gripped by a big freeze, Councils up and down the country are in a predicament,
County road chiefs have already used nearly two thirds of the salt stockpiled before the big freeze, KentOnline can reveal.
Kent County Council had stored 23,000 tonnes of salt before the winter season began in October.
Now it says there's just 8,000 tonnes left at its seven depots across the county.
So what does the LGA organise and advertise today?
Can we afford not to adapt to climate change?
In breathless prose they pose the question...
Action by local authorities will be essential in ensuring that the UK is well prepared for a changing climate. If we are not prepared this could leave our services and our communities vulnerable and have a severe impact on future budgets.
How can local authorities ensure their communities, services and buildings are resilient to future climate impacts?
What like snow and ice?

They just do not get it do they. They are still planning for this sort of stuff,
If temperatures rise and flash floods occur more frequently, or if new pests or diseases appear, this could create sudden, traumatic and expensive strains on many of the services that councils deliver. It could also be a disaster for local economies.
When the reality on the ground is somewhat different. Is it any wonder that they don't have the true grit required by the country, when they won't buy grit but prefer to spend money on those expected to turn up to the conference,
  • Members/Portfolio Holders and Officers with responsibilities for: Environment and Emergency Planning as well as Health, Social Care, Education, Transport, Economic Development and Finance
  • Consultants
  • Representatives from the private and third sector involved in the climate change agenda

The EU's choice, Murdoch or Cable

The EU today cleared Rupert Murdochs takeover of BSkyB. According to the Commission's Joaquin Almunia, EC vice-president and Komissar for competition,
"I am confident this merger will not weaken competition in the UK."
Vince Cable was reported as publically commenting,
"Whilst it has found there are no issues on competition grounds, the EC's decisions on this are independent from the outcome of the separate UK investigation into the merger's potential impact on the sufficiency of media plurality within the UK.
"Ofcom are due to report into this separate matter by the end of this month. I will review their findings once Parliament returns and I will then take the decision on whether this case needs to be referred to the Competition Commission for a full investigation."
Which is interesting as he appears to have told the Telegraph journalists, where the idea that his review will be fair minded is at very best trashed,
"I have declared war on Mr Murdoch, I think I'll win. I didn't politicise it because it is a legal situation.

"He is trying to take over BSkyB. He has a minority shareholding and he wants a majority - and majority control would give them a massive stake. I have blocked it using the powers that I have,

"For people who know what is happening, this is a big, big thing."

According to the BBC, Mr Cable goes on to say: "His (Mr Murdoch's) whole empire is now under attack... So there are things like that we do in government, that we can't do... all we can do in opposition is protest."
The EU has obviously decided that notwithstanding the LibDems support of the EU and all its doings, it would prefer to get the Murdoch press on their side. Sensible of them I would say.

Lets see if the Sun becomes a little less Eurosceptic - after all the Times has already moved in a pro-EU direction in recent months.
This morning I was sure that Cabel would survivre, after this I am no longer convionced. St Vince must be on his way out. Is it too early for David Laws (the con artist) to be brought back?

Update,
Guido asks a very pertinant question
Why Did the Telegraph Hide “War on Murdoch” Story?



Wanna stop snowballs now, wanna go home

Tim suggests a reason for the Commission getting shirty with the aiports and the whole transport chaos that is engulfing Western Europe,
Would it be impolite of me to point out that the European officials, European Commission and Siim Kallas are all highly likely to be trying to use that closed Brussels airport to get home for the holidays?

Economic tradeoffs about extreme and rare weather be damned when it’s only the taxpayers’ money being wasted to reunite a politician with his Saturnalia Feast, eh?
But of course there are reasons for the chaos.

Obviously the prime cause of the trouble is the snow, and wintery weather. In winter.

So why are the airports unable to cope? Take a look at this little press release from the Commission, from all of a month or so ago,
European Commission Vice-President Siim Kallas, responsible for transport, today commended Brussels Airport for its commitment to reducing future carbon emissions. At a ceremony held in the departure hall of the airport, Vice-President Kallas presented Mr Arnaud Feist, CEO of Brussels Airport, with a certificate marking its progress under an industry-led carbon accreditation scheme.
He larded Mr Arnaud with plaudits,
But now he is annoyed, annoyed that as I mentioned yesterday Zaventum Airport has closed,
"Airports must get serious about planning for this kind of severe weather conditions. We have seen in recent years that snow in Western Europe is not such an exceptional circumstance. Better preparedness, in line with what is done in Northern Europe, is not an optional extra.
The thing is Siim, that if you spend all that time and money promoting the idea that we are all going to fry, if you start to hand out awards to airports for concentrating on global warming, then don't be surprised if that is what they do, and fail to concentrate on reality, which is that we still get winters.

So will you please stop hassleing the transport companies, who I suspect have had it up to their eyeballs with your unsolicited advice, and let them get on with the job of trying to get the continent moving again,.

This, I can sssure you will not help,
The European Commission is monitoring the situation very closely and is in constant touch with airlines, airports, rail operators and national authorities responsible for passenger rights.


"Sustainability is not an 'optional extra' in transport policy. It has to come as standard." He congratulated ACI Europe on the success of its Airport Carbon Accreditation Scheme, and welcomed the progress made by Brussels Airport in reducing on a voluntary basis to reduce its carbon emissions over time.

Jonathan Hunt asks some serious questions about the Guardian's involement in Wikileaks

o

The question is, will any future investigation into the Wikileaks affair look closely at the activities of the Guardian? Jonathan Hunt, who has crossed swords with the Guardian's methods before shows clearly the way in which the paper has manipulated the whole affair to continue its campaign of vilification against the United States.

HT Jonathan Hunt, and Autonomous Mind.


4/10 : Hungarian Presidency must do better

Urkuti György is an official over at the Hungarain Presidencu of the EU which is due to start on the 1st of January.

As such he has quite a poisoned chalice as he will be defending all sorts of weird and wonderful stuff over the coming 6 months. But I guess it wll be easier given he has a government, unlike the poor Belgian's who are relinquishing their jaded crown.

What makes him interesting is that he has started a blog,  but in that ineffable way that the EU just fails to get it, it is a blog as Kosmopolit points out,
But without comments & broken RSS feed? Not so good!
They really do need to set their dial top recieve as well as transmit if they are to be taken seriously.

The content of the blog is inadvertantkly amusing,

Citing 'What if' a poem by Endre Ady he goes on to say,
Still, on the occasion of the Hungarian EU Presidency an attempt may be worthwile. Maybe we Hungarians will be able to demonstrate, even with such a tool, that the EU is much more than just the waffling of diplomatic eggheads dressed in gray suits. That the EU is more than just an overly bureauctratized cash dispenser.


Decisions based on the Union’s policies are also important in our everyday lives, no matter whether we talk about the compensations to flood victims, marital divorce cases, pensions, or the drug called mefedrine. These are all topics in which the Union had delivered meaningful decisions, while rather few people are familiar with them. Boring news reports may be blamed partially. But let’s try it in a different way! What if the blog of the Hungarian Presidency can contribute – with tools rather modest – in making important subjects better known?
I think he means, what if we use blogs? But hold on, he is right, the EU is indeed more than an "overly bureauctratized cash dispenser". After all in a bank, people puts the money in, in order that they can take their own money out. In the EU people put the money in, under the threat of prison after all , in ordere that other people, with whom they have little sympathy can can take money out.

It is not a benign fountain of shekels.

Though he really ought to set up a comments function, when he does he had better be prepared for the brickbats that will inevitably come his way.

The Epicentre of Revolution

Bob Ainswoth is railing against what he obviously considers to be dark forces on his twitter feed this morning.

Obviously he fears that this Brigade is some sort of Militia, maybe a local outcrop of those terrifying 'Forces of Conservatism' that his former master once so impotently raged against.

Who he really despises, holds in contempt are the residents of Burton Green who are incensed, rightly in my opinion that their village is to be destroyed by the vast waste of money that is the planned High Speed rail Link.

This is what he is up against,
Village Hall


Fri 19th Nov 2010
AGM 7pm All Welcome, Cheese and Wine

Fri 10th Dec 2010
Senior Citizens Christmas Lunch

Sat 4th Feb 2011
Murder Mystery

Sat 16th April 2011
Live theatre comes to the Village Hall

Sat 2nd July 2011
BBQ

Sunday 11th September 2011
Annual Flower and Produce Show
You see the problem don't you. The problem that Mr Ainsworth has here is people. You know the solid beating heart of the English countryside. Here they are again, the bastards, fighting for their own slice of the country which they call home,


What a shower, how dare they.

And here is the self styled CO of the local Militia, 'Col' Chris Langton Chairman of the Resident's Association.

Dangerous looking blighter isn't he?

Is the glue dissolving?

Simon Tilford, Chief Economist and the Uber Federalist think tank, the Centre for European Reform has written a piece on his vision for greater centralisation of the EU as a method of keeping the whole thing together, indeed the only method of doing so.
They have to summon the political courage to make the case for greater economic integration. A fiscal union can also be fashioned in such a way that limits moral hazard. But all of this requires leadership, not least from Germany. The fact that the alternative – a series of ever larger and ineffective bail-outs, culminating in far bigger defaults and a systemic banking sector crash – is much worse, ought to focus minds. After all, under that scenario the political glue holding the union together could dissolve altogether.
He goes through the normal arguments, which from his perspective make a great deal of sense,
restructuring the debts of Greece, Ireland and Portugal
is one such.
an aggressive programme of government bond purchases. Monies from the European Financial Stability Fund (EFSF) could also be used to tide the countries over until they regain access to the financial markets on affordable terms
Is another, which given the rapid slowing of Bond purchases by the ECB recently is suggests that there is neither the will nor the money to do.
Finally he suggests that,
Governments need to support the Commission's drive to foster closer economic integration and to co-ordinate their policies to ensure that they are compatible with balanced economic growth across the eurozone. Huge current account balances are not consistent with a stable currency union, because one way or another they require massive (and hence politically and economically destabilising) transfers between the participating economies. However, even if trade imbalances are reduced, there will have to be greater fiscal supra-nationalism. This could take the form of a common E-bond, some minimal fiscal union, or ideally a combination of the two. Without some element of fiscal supra-nationalism, the adjustment costs facing countries that cede trade competitiveness within the eurozone will simply be too high.
Tough call but coherent. But iff you accept his starting premise. Viz,
Time is running out to prevent the eurozone crisis from imperilling Europe's banking system and with it the integrity of the currency union. It is beholden on policy-makers to minimise the economic (and hence political costs) to the EU.
Which has got to be deeply contentious. He is claiming that policy makers (those we would call politicians) should be duty bound to show their loyalty to an abstraction, a dream of the European Union.

Surely those who are elected should have as their duty serving the wishes and needs of their constituents, no more, no less. For them to act on the drive of a faith, an abstraction rather than on the hopes and wishes of their own electorate is both undemocratic and wrong.

Mr Tilford calls for Europe's politicians to act irrationally, to dispense with reason in order to service a belief system. This is folly and dangerous folly at that.

Monday, December 20, 2010

Does it make you feel better?

Just got this missive through ,
the Airport of Zaventem will be closed from this evening (Monday 20.12) until Wednesday morning (exact hours not yet known).
This is because,
The stock of de-icing fluid at Brussels Airport is almost fully used up and no new supply can be delivered due to the weather conditions
Now do you feel better? What with MEPs and officials threatened with being stuck in Brussels for the Christmas period. You see if they vcannot get the de-icing fluid now, how are they going to get it by Wednesday?
Tuesday


Chance of Snow. Partly Cloudy. High: 2 °C . Wind Calm. 20% chance of precipitation (trace amounts).

Tuesday Night

Chance of Snow. Partly Cloudy. Low: 0 °C . Wind Calm. 30% chance of precipitation (water equivalent of 1.82 mm). Windchill: -4 °C .

Wednesday

Chance of Rain. Partly Cloudy. High: 2 °C . Wind SSE 25 km/h . 30% chance of precipitation (water equivalent of 1.15 mm). Windchill: -3 °C .

Wednesday Night

Chance of Snow. Partly Cloudy. Low: -1 °C . Wind SW 18 km/h . 20% chance of precipitation (trace amounts). Windchill: -3 °C .

Thursday

Chance of Snow. Overcast. High: 2 °C . Wind Calm. 20% chance of precipitation (trace amounts).

Thursday Night

Chance of Snow. Overcast. Low: -1 °C . Wind Calm. 20% chance of precipitation (trace amounts). Windchill: -3 °C .


Planned prisoner votes legislation is a dog's dinner

James Forsyth on the Spectator blog has poited to Mark Harper's statement today about what the Government plans to do about prisoner votes. He claims there will be a Tory rebellion,
A lot of sensible Tory backbenchers think that the coalition could have responded far more robustly to the Strasbourg court’s decision.
If the whips are not careful, the whole issue could become a proxy for Tory concerns about the failure to move on a British Bill of Rights which its proponents claim would offer some protection from the rulings of the increasingly activist Strasbourg Court.
The thing is that it will be a proxy for more than that.

The proposals state,
• Prisoners sentenced to less than four years in jail will get the right to vote. Those sentenced to more than four years won't. The ECHR judgment doesn't mean all prisoners have to be allowed to vote, and a four-year cut off has been chosen because that is regarded as the distinction between a short- and long-term jail sentence. Judges will also have the right to remove the right to vote from prisoners sentenced to less than four years if they consider that appropriate.
• Prisoners will only be able to vote in Westminster or European elections. They will not vote in local elections or referendums. This means they will not get to vote for elected police commissioners.
• They will not be registered to vote at the prison. They will be registered at their former address, and they will vote by post or by proxy. This means candidates do not have to worry about a block of 1,000-odd prisoners from one jail affecting the result of a constituency election.
• MPs will vote on these measures next year. The government has to change the law by August 2011 to meet a deadline set by the ECHR.
Prisoner votes is yet another area where UKIP are in tune with the vast majority of the British public, and the formal political establishment are off in cuckoo land.


Some Tory backbenchers see this, and some may rebel. However please don't think that opposition to prisoner votes is merely an issue for those who traditionally vote Tory. Ask around in Labour areas and the idea is trashed and any proponent is treated with contempt.

I am prepared to bet that if the coalition get this one past, which they will, then Mr Hirst will be back over in Strasbourg demanding that this new law be overturned. And a side bet is that he will win.

If you accept the jurisdiction of the ECHR, which this government does and UKIP rejects, then you accept their decisions. Not piecemeal, but in their entirety.



Thursday, December 16, 2010

Tory shame

So the Treaty is to change
Now that EU leaders have agreed to change the treaty, the text will be sent to the European Parliament, the European Commission and the European Central Bank. The three institutions have to give their opinion on proposals to change the treaty but their views do not bind the European Council.

The treaty change will be approved at the European Council in March, if the three institutions have given their views by then. The text will then be sent to the 27 member states for ratification. The aim is to complete ratification by 1 January 2013 so that the mechanism can be set up in June that year.

The treaty change was requested by Germany, which argues that without it the new mechanism could be challenged in Germany's constitutional court.
Of course we get no referendum, despite the treaty change, and despite this, found on the Tory website by James Pryor
Join our campaign for an EU referendum
Monday, April 27 2009

Ahead of the European elections on 4th June, David Cameron has launched a campaign to get Gordon Brown to honour his pledge to give the British people a referendum on the EU Treaty.
In their 2005 election manifesto, Labour promised to hold a referendum on the EU Constitution.
David stressed the Lisbon Treaty was a “re-branded” version of that Constitution and attacked Gordon Brown for having “flip-flopped”:
“First he was against the Constitution, then he was for it; one day he promised a referendum, the next he backtracked. While he has chopped and changed, our position has remained exactly the same. We are the only major party to have consistently said that it is up to the British people to decide on our future in Europe.”
David promised that if the Constitution was not in force at the time of the General Election, a Conservative Government would hold a referendum on it, urge a no vote, and reverse Britain’s ratification if successful.
He explained, “I believe that if you make a promise in your manifesto, and the country votes on that manifesto, then you are honour-bound to keep that promise.”
If I was still a Tory I would be ashamed of myself. But I am not,  because I couldn't look myself in the eye. Joining UKIP was a one way I could stand up and be honest with myself.

"manifestly abusive, frivolous or vexatious"

The problem with the new EU citizen's initiative passed by the European Parliament today can be summed up by the criteria by which such an initiative will be to the powers that be, that is the European Commission.
The ECI concept is, as they say,
is aimed at bringing EU institutions closer to the people and addressing what critics describe as the EU's "democratic deficit".
Of course whilst the idea that one just has to get 1,000,000 signatures together to get them to change their laws sounds great that isn't actually what is on offer of course. These are the hoops you must jump through.
  • the citizens' committee has been formed and the contact persons designated,
  • the initiative does not manifestly fall outside the sphere of the Commission's powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the Union for the purpose of implementing the Treaties,
  • the initiative is not manifestly abusive, frivolous or vexatious, and
  • the initiative is not manifestly contrary to the values of the European Union as set out in the Treaty.
The heart sinks with that dread phrase "citizen's committee". For the love of God, it sounds like something created by Robespierre or Brother No 1. But the real problem are whether the initiative is "frivolous or vexatious" or whether it is "manifestly contrary to the values of the European Union".

The decisions as to what is or what isn't frivolous, or indeed what is or isn't contrary to European values is made of course by the European Commission.

So they decide what is acceptable. What I foresee and foretell is that these initiatives will essentially be like the NGO's already funded by the EU. They will accept only those things that they already want to happen. No citizen's initiative will be allowed to pass that isn't already the dearest wish of a massive proportion of the European Elite.

Instead of Democracy we will have its simulacrum, guided democracy, cheerlead by organisations , so favoured of the elite, Greenpeace, Carbon Credit organisations and the like.

What about a petition of over a million calling for a legal upper limit personal carbon emissions? You could easily get your million signatures from totalitarian idiots from around the 27 countries of Europe. The Commission would rubber stamp the concept and sure enough along will come the legislation.

How about a petition to allow al migrants immediate access to welfare state provisions? Or one that would force companies to pay equal pay rates to men and women based on age, and length of service in the company? Please bring them on.

Now how about a million signatures for the introduction of the death penalty for child killers? You could easily get the required number of vengeful furies to sign up across the 27 countries. But of course it would be disallowed.

These Initiatives are at the whim not of the people, but of the European Elite. They will offer the wrapping of democracy, but it will be nothing of the sort.

Can you imagine if we put together a million signatures from across the 27 calling for a vote on whether Ireland should be bailed out, or whether the UK should be thrown out?

The Treaty Changes: No referendum

That's the beauty of the Simplified Revision procedure. And the weakness of our government. This is the statement from the European Council tonight in preparation for tomorrow's meeting.
On the basis of a report from the President, the European Council will discuss a limited treaty
amendment for a permanent mechanism to safeguard the financial stability of the euro area.
The mechanism will replace the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and the European
Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM), which will remain in force until June 2013. Activation of the permanent mechanism, in the event of a risk to the stability of the euro area, will require mutual agreement of the euro area member states.

The treaty change would involve revising Article 136 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the
European Union by adding a paragraph under which member states whose currency is the euro may establish amongst themselves a stability mechanism to safeguard the stability of the euro area as a whole and stating that the granting of financial assistance under the mechanism will be made subject to strict conditionality.
Britain's position is made explicit in this piece in the FT this evening,
The UK was also causing some pre-summit concern because of their backroom efforts to clarify that non-euro countries would not be involved in any future eurozone bailouts. But diplomats said Britain has dropped a push to get such clarity into the treaty language.

Instead, Prime Minister David Cameron appears ready to settle for a clear statement from the leaders that an EU-wide fund, like the €60bn portion of the current bail-out system which is supported by the EU’s own budget, will never be created again once the temporary fund winds down in 2013.
The problem with this, as anybody who has watched Brussels and the Council over the last few years (something that seems to have escaped the current crop of Tories), he has swapped something solid, something legally defensible "clarity in the treaty" for something indefinable and essentially worthless, "a clear statement from leaders". He is a politician who knows what it is to dissemble to his own people, see his "cast iron guarantee" so why would he trust other country's politicians?

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Good money after bad

Bulgaria is essentially a very corrupt country. Sad but true. It is one of those countries that the EU waved in without completing basic anti-corruption measures. Only last month,
An EU-commissioned report has named Bulgaria, Romania and Poland as the three countries with the highest levels of organized crime and corruption in the European Union.

The report, conducted by a Bulgarian-based NGO, the Centre for Study of Democracy, presented its findings on Tuesday in the Bulgarian capital, Sofia.
Rather worrying wouldn't you think,
The police, judiciary and local authorities remain highly vulnerable to corruption and organized crime in Bulgaria, the report noted.

"Just in the traffic police alone there are around 100,000 cases of bribes a month," said Tihomir Bezlov, from the NGO, said.

Philip Gunev, from the same NGO, told Balkan Insight that many criminals in Bulgaria were former policemen, customs officers or investigators, men with the right connections to corrupt and influence the system.

Organized criminals are spreading their influence into political parties, concludes the report.

Gunev warned that the culture of impunity among the judiciary in Bulgaria was worrying. "Despite widespread allegations about corruption in the system, not a single judge has been convicted for corruption,” he said.
So would seem the ideal place to send over 50 million Eros of our taxes to fight climate change?
Grants for energy efficiency projects in 58 Bulgarian municipalities under EU programs have been approved on Monday, Sofia News Agency wrote. Thus, a total of BGN 105 M will be apportioned to improve the energy efficiency of 215 schools and kindergartens with a total of 85 000 students. On Monday, Lilyana Pavlova, Deputy Regional Development Minister signed the contracts for the funds with the municipal mayors.

The funding is provided under two mechanisms of EU's Regional Development Operational Program. The first is for larger cities and includes projects of the Sofia Municipality, Pleven, and Ruse, while the second one is for energy efficiency in smaller towns. As a result of the investments, the 58 municipalities should be saving 2 million MW/h of electricity annually.
I would give pretty good odds that much of this money won't quite make it to the kiddies.

Over 50% of failing businesses cite EU regulations as part of their downfall

Horrifying stat from the FSB in Wales this morning,
“In the EU, every year 1.7 million businesses fail and over 50% of these cite the regulatory burden as a significant factor.
Horrifying but oh so predictable. We have a regulation factory churning out rules which only succeed in throttling the life out of the businesses that create the wealth that allows organisations like the EU to survive.
In nature a successful parasite is one that weakens the defences of its host while failing to kill it. The weakening allows the parasite to propagate itself effectively.
So with tapeworm, so with the EU.

AS the FSB points out,
Mrs Jones said the EU’s economy is teeming with ‘micro’ businesses that want to grow bigger.

“Excessive red-tape and a growing skills shortage stop this from happening,” she added.

“If 50% of small businesses in the EU employed one extra person there would be an additional 10 million jobs.”

Monday, December 13, 2010

So when will the money run out?

This is more than a little concerning for those who think that the EU will be able to weather the storm,
THE European Central Bank is considering requesting an increase in its capital to help cope with the rising costs of fighting the eurozone debt crisis, Reuters sources have said.

ECB policymakers have repeatedly signalled that the central bank cannot bear the brunt of fire-fighting against bond market attacks on highly indebted euro zone states.
“The issue is that the ECB is worried about potential losses from its bond buying,” one source said.
“At the moment we are buying very modest amounts, but what if that is increased, and what if the bonds you buy are suddenly worth 30 per cent less?” the source said, referring to the risk of a writedown on a eurozone government’s debt.
The report continues,
The ECB declined to comment.
Cannot say that I am surprised.

War clouds threaten, and swords rattle in their sheaths, and the new Continental system is unwrapped.

We are to go to war again, with Iceland. Richard Benyon, the landlocked farmer who represents these Isles on fisheries matters is off to Brussels tomorrow, nomibnally to fight for British fishing. He has of course used that traditional old line,
Environment minister Richard Benyon said last night that the EU’s Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) was “not fit for purpose” and that he would be calling for reform.
Every single minister who has been responsible for fisheries policies has said that since the days of Heath's Government, and all the while they have presided over the absolute destruction of a once great industry. They have presided over an environmental catastrophe, and now.

Now it looks like our friends on the continent are gunning up for a second war with Iceland. Cod War II.
In what some observers are already calling "Cod Wars II", EU nations are expected to take retaliatory action to put pressure on Iceland and the Faroes to reduce the quantity of mackerel they catch. The EU has already threatened trade sanctions which could result in a ban on Faroese and Icelandic imports of cod, herring, whiting, haddock and mackerel. Iceland set a 130,000-ton quota this year while the Faroes gave themselves an 85,000-ton quota. The figures are many times bigger than five years ago.
Interestingly it appears that both sides have been acting in bad faith,
The EU and Norway last night (Friday) set a multi-lateral quota of 646,000 tonnes, which is in line with the ICES recommendations for the whole stock.
The agreement will lead to the UK's mackerel share to grow by 14,000 tonnes to 190,000 tonnes
Which would leave the Faroese, the Icelandics and the Russians with er -5%
The Faroese point out that the fish hang around in their, not EU waters and thus will set their own quotas.

So this will not be a war of gunboats and ramming, but of blockades and writs. The EU is planning a new Continental System.

Julian Assange invented the blog,

Only he calls it scientific journalism,
Scientific journalism allows you to read a news story, then to click online to see the original document it is based on. That way you can judge for yourself: Is the story true? Did the journalist report it accurately?
Don't you feel blessed by Wikileaks?

Saturday, December 11, 2010

On one hand... on the other

First read this from Lobbydog last week.
a group of the new Tory intake have been selected as right-wing ‘buffers’.

They’ve been sanctioned by the Tory leadership to discuss certain issues in the media which have been deemed too politically sensitive for the leadership to talk openly about.

Their purpose is to make sure right-wing party members and associations see that their issues are not being ignored in Westminster.

But obviously it also offers the opportunity for the leadership to co-opt a potentially troublesome element of the parliamentary party.
Ok, that sort of makes sense, people like Dan Hannan and Dougie Carswell give the party a sheen of Eurosceptic, localist sheen. This keeps enough of the old fashioned, small state, patriotic Tories on board as they can see elected conservatives doing and saying what they believe in. The problem is of course that the party will not listen to them and they will achieve nothing.

Which makes reading this extremely interesting.
MPs angry about being ignored on Europe and other issues of concern to traditionalists were apparently gearing up to take their revenge.
Many were furious that the Coalition leadership was bending over backwards to accommodate Lib Dem MPs, giving them the right to abstain, while Tory backbenchers have been repeatedly ordered to vote for legislation they do not like, or indeed detest.
The ceding of a series of major powers to Europe, the increasing of international aid, the decision to have a referendum on voting reform, the redrawing of constituency boundaries – all had been eating away at Tory backbenchers for months. Worse than that, their concerns had been repeatedly brushed aside by Mr Cameron.
Forced into the division lobbies to back a European foreign ministry and increased EU budget, they felt enough was enough.
Tensions boiled over at a tumultuous session of the 1922 committee of backbenchers on Wednesday during which MPs exploded in anger at Sir George Young, Leader of the House.
Which is all well and good, but then Ms Kite goes on to say,
The most vociferous critics of the Coalition were new intake MPs, young, ambitious men and women in their 30s and 40s.
Mr Cameron had perhaps assumed that these high flyers would be prepared to toe the line for the sake of future advancement, but far from being keen as mustard, they were in a state of severe disillusionment.
Which if it is true could mean the end of the coalition, as it will be constantly having to deal with splits and rebellions which will sap it of power, energy and direction, culminating in some god awful mess. It will fall over something small.

But I am not convinced, and this is why, if this is the case,
"We came to this place to try to achieve something, to have a voice, and we find that we have no say," was how one new backbencher put it. "We are sick of being taken for granted."
Then the reasons given for not rebelling seem frankly pathetic,
The mood of rebellion was made worse by changes to the expenses system which have seen the new intake pilloried in their local newspapers in recent weeks for items in their first claim forms, just published.
"They just went beserk," said one MP present. "They couldn't take any more. They want Cameron to listen to them and they are getting desperate enough to do anything to make him listen.
"In the end, the infantry does not mutiny over the reasons for the war, or the tactics, but over their conditions."
This newspaper understands that more than a dozen Tory MPs told the whips before the tuition fees vote on Thursday that they might vote against the legislation purely in protest at how they had been treated.
Even some MPs on record as supporting fees threatened to join the "no" lobby in order to teach Cameron a lesson.
At one stage, Tory whips were so desperate they called in potential rebels and told them that if they voted against the government, they would not get any help to find a new constituency when the proposed boundary changes went through.
"In other words, "vote against us, and we will turf you out of your seat".
C'mon guys, don't use the expenses system for stuff that you cannot justify to your mother, and for pities sake, with the spread of open primaries, and the fact that you will; be publicly doing something to save your countries do you not have the confidence that you will get selected? And for that matter, if you are so craven you are cowed by those threats, then why should the country care about you anyway, you are still part of the problem.

My guess is Lobbydog is closer to the truth, any rebellions will be part licensed. After all what punishments have indeed been meted out? The ones mentioned are so far in the future that they are near meaningless, by the time of the next selection process the likelihood will be that there will be a different set of priorities.There are those who walk a fine line and have not been blown out of the water. Why not?

 Because, in my view they are necessary to keep one side of the big tent from blowing down.

You could get a few rounds in with this

Just been wiffling through the General Budget of the European Union, as you do on a Saturday morning, and this little item in the Parliament budget caught my eye.
Article 3 0 4 — Miscellaneous expenditure on meetings 
Item 3 0 4 0 — Miscellaneous expenditure on internal meetings 
You know, the loose change, indeed this budget line is 
intended to cover the costs of the beverages, refreshments and occasional light meals served at meetings held by the institution, together with the management costs for these services.
Appropriations 2010 : 3 050 000

Now admittedly this drops in 2011 to 2.5 million, but both are a huge leap up from the 2.1 of 2009. The thing is, if an MEP hosts a reception they have to pay for the drinks themselves. So this is only the official Parliamentary events. The coffee handed round during Committee meetings, the individual bottles of water, that sort of stuff. Surely the MEPs and staff could get their own coffee? Surely they can use tap water like normal people (and it would help their precious carbon footprint too).

Friday, December 10, 2010

A Story of Ignorance - How to spend an (EU) aid budget

No really, over the past week the EU has been having what it calls its Development days.

Here is Commissioner Piebalgs baffling on about how wonderful they are. What he fails to mention is the terribly important fashion show, (pic right) which has fed thousands, and cured hordes as it took place at the Royal Museum in in Brussels, centre of poverty.

Then you have this list of suckers on the public teat, all sitting in the "Development Village". All after taxpayer funded contracts.

And they all do it in a nice warm moral glow, of course sponsored by you and me, everything you do at the Development days can be offset for carbon. Good, feel better about yourselves?

These days you don't pay for a stand, you offset your stand,
The organisers are therefore inviting exhibitors and organisers of events to make a contribution to a carbon-offset scheme of their choice (see links on the right), in the following amounts:
- € 500 (excluding VAT) for a standard stand
- € 1000 (excluding VAT) for an ad-hoc stand 
- € 1000 (excluding VAT) for a seminar
- € 3000 (excluding VAT) for a high level panel
Proof of this contribution should be provided at the time of online registration.

Please note that emissions generated in Belgium can be offset anywhere in the world. Since energy-saving projects can have a positive social impact, the EDD organisers recommend buying carbon offsets from organisations funding projects in partner countries.
Feeling better about yourselves, well stop it because I present you with what has to be a satire. Back to Piebags again,
During the same ceremony I also handed over an Award to the winners of the Music against Poverty contest! Antonia (17) and Mareike (18) from Germany are the winners of the Prize of the Jury and their song “A story of ignorance” was selected among the 200 submissions we’ve received.
Here it is


Here are its lyrics, I kid you not.
A story of ignorance

Since this song started,
every 2 seconds, it's a fact,
10 children have left us,
but it's a fact: it's not really your fault.
The views on the news are
"we love to entertain you".

The policy-makers need to do something.
But you will not rest longer,
choose right now and radically,
anything else would be so ordinary.
At Christmas you give your money into black hands,
the poverty remains in the poor country.

Chorus
How much longer will we continue with ignorance?
Apart from compassionate looks, there's nothing more.
How often do we shut our ears,
so that the cries will rest more quickly.
Our consumption is killing the others,
but who passes sleepless nights about this?
We could all do more.

And your child is learning at school,
but must not hear about poverty, the hungry and gays.
The shape of the curve is what you discuss,
too much questioning is quickly resolved.

Chorus

Sometimes I get the question,
what if I was born in another country,
but I quickly push it aside
I cannot help it,
that I walk into pure happiness.
They had 200 entries and they selected this. Quite how bad, how trite how frankly self hating and stupid were the others?

What, I wonder were the judges looking for? The song is called 'A story of ignorance'.

Oh and all this is costing thousands and thousands.

Update
I underestimated the cost
The European Commission has been condemned for spending three million euros hosting a lavish anti-poverty development conference for 6,000 people in Brussels.

Who's next?

Over the last few years the EU has been driving its foriegn policy through the use of acess to visas. According to the Foriegn Policy Centre's Mark Leonard in the Sunday Times (£) last week, this is an example of the EU using it's soft power.

To that end we have had the spectacle of the EU overuling the UK government on immigration over India, and Moldova, and Serbia and Ukraine and so on.

N ext up I suspect may well be Azerbaijan. No seriously, despite the fact that most people couldn't place it on a map this suggests that they are indeed next.
The European Union may make a decision to launch negotiations with Azerbaijan on visa regime facilitation and readmission next months.


"Perhaps, the EU may decide to launch negotiations with Azerbaijan on visa facilitation and readmission for the next 2-3 months," Deputy Foreign Minister Mahmud Mammadguliyev told media.

Azerbaijan continues negotiating with the EU within the "Eastern Partnership" program. The next round of talks is planned to be held in Baku next January, he said.
Why is this important? Well simply because the coalition government have accepted that there is nothing they can do about immigration from within the EU, but keep on banging on about how they can deal with Non-EU immigration.

It just isn't true. If the EU decides to hand Visas over to country X or Y then there is nothing Cameron can do about it, bar stick his head in the sand and repeat the 'cutting non EU migration' mantra.

"Which is a better country to be poor in?"

Great idea for a story from Malcolm Brabant, he asks,
"Which is a better country to be poor in?"
Many young Greeks are emigrating to escape the worst of the cuts - but there is also a large number of Irish immigrants in the country facing difficult questions about their future.

Thursday, December 09, 2010

One Country, one people, one olympic team?

The Hairy Moneyball, currently being slated for intense sense of humour failure over at Dick's has been having a good few days. Not only has she railed against a calander - boo hiss (did she complain about the WI - I doubt it).

Here she is wistfully dreaming,
"who knows, maybe we will see a European team at the Olympics"
This was at a hearing in the European Parliament which was discussing,
"A future European sports policy: the right level of EU involvement in sport and potential areas of EU action"
None I would have thought.

What is art for?

I only ask because I have always shared the opinion of that great American, James McNeil Whistler, he of the nocturnes and a mother who made it clear in his magnificent book, the Gentle Art of Making Enemies,
Art should be independent of all claptrap—should stand alone, and appeal to the artistic sense of eye and ear, without confounding this with emotions entirely foreign to it, as devotion, pity, love, patriotism, and the like. All these have no kind of concern with it.
Quite so. As soon as you want art or culture generally to mean something, to have a proscribed role you start to walk down very worrying paths like socialist realism, or the sort of art so beloved of Mr Hitler and his chums. Not only that, after you have Culture (always with a capital C) working for you, then of course those things that do not fall in line with your own way of thinking, your own approved message become some form of anti-culture, or indeed something more akin to degenerate art.

Thus we have our German chum stating,
For the artist does not create for the artist, but just like every one else he creates for the people.

And we will see to it that from now on the people will once again be called upon to be the judges of their own art....

I do not want anybody to have false illusions: National-Socialism has made it its primary task to rid the German Reich, and thus, the German people and its life of all those influences which are fatal and ruinous to its existence. And although this purge cannot be accomplished in one day, I do not want to leave the shadow of a doubt as to the fact that sooner or later the hour of liquidation will strike for those phenomena which have participated in this corruption.

But with the opening of this exhibition the end of German art foolishness and the end of the destruction of its culture will have begun.

From now on we will wage an unrelenting war of purification against the last elements of putrefaction in our culture.
Elsewhere we have Socialist realism which can be simply defined thus,
A Marxist aesthetic doctrine that seeks to promote the development of socialism through didactic use of literature, art, and music.
Alright so where is all this leading. It is leading here. For our masters have decided what culture is for. It is,
no longer only to create art or literature. "Cultural Diplomacy" is increasingly being used as a vehicle to promote liberal democratic values and to foster "democracy and participation",
Marietje Schaake a Dutch Liberal MEP has come up with this new/old idea for Culture.
1. Underlines the transversal character of culture and believes that culture needs to be considered in the widest sense, as both fostering and embodying European values, that evolved historically;
2. Stresses that democratic and fundamental freedoms such as freedom of expression, press freedom, access to information and communication, freedom of worship, freedom from want and freedom from fear, and freedom to connect, online and offline, are preconditions for cultural expression, cultural exchanges and cultural diversity;
3. Reiterates that cultural cooperation plays a role in bilateral agreements on development and trade, and through instruments such as the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP), the Eastern Partnership, the Union for the Mediterranean and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR), which all have resources allocated to cultural programmes;
The problem with all this is that those who fail to concur, those who, in as Whislter puts it "stand alone" run the risk of being ostracised. Culture has no purpose whilst it is happening, it is only in hindsight that we me be able to perceive purposes within it. The European Union's attempts through al sorts of prizes and funding streams to hijack talents and imagination of the continent's arists is wrong.

I hand over to the thoughts of Mr Biafra on this. Compulsory liberalism.

A bed for Special Branch?

It appears that the staff of Bairbre de Brún are looking for a flatmate.
We have a room to rent, in a shared apartment with 2 girls. It is a big room, and the apartment is also big, it is central and very nice.


Rent is 415 a month all included.

It is available immediately,
So go on chaps, or chappeses, does your long arm stretch out to Brussels? May as well do it now as Barbara Brown is away in Cancun.

Which gives rise to a limerick,

A pasty faced Shinner named Brun,
Preached to all about climate doom,
At the top of her voice,
Swore, "I just have no choice"
On her carbon fueled flight to Cancun,



The one eyed seer of o'Kirkcaldy

What has the great expert to say, what is he telling us? He is of course very wise, and has been away in the North ruminating in his wisdom,
"I sense that in the first few months of 2011, we have got a major crisis in the euro area."
Well blow me down I wouldn't have guessed. I would have thought that even pregnant teenagers on a Bolton estate would have worked that out by now.

But there is more,
Failure to solve the euro's problems in "one fell swoop" would condemn the continent to "a decade of high unemployment and low growth", he warned.
The crisis would affect the UK, even though it is not in the single currency, because 60% of its trade is with eurozone countries.
Eh? Run that past me again you Scottish greymalkin. You are claiming that 60% of our trade is with the Eurozone! Given that the figures in the pink book, compiled while you were in office tell is that only 44.1% is with the Eurozone.
Written answers and statements, 2 December 2010
Lord Pearson of Rannoch (UKIP)
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the remarks by Lord Sassoon on 8 November (Official Report, col. 1-4), what is their definition of trade in the statement that "40 per cent of the United Kingdom's trade goes to Europe".

Lord Sassoon (Commercial Secretary, HM Treasury; Conservative)
The definition of trade used on 8 November was total UK trade (exports and imports) with the 16 members of the European Economic and Monetary Union (EMU) that have adopted the Euro currency. According to the latest Office for National Statistics 2010 Pink Book publication, in 2009, 44.1 per cent of total UK trade was with EMU countries.
Only 15.9% out. Easy mistake really. I mean given that the figures for trade are about 400 billion per annum, losing 16% down the back of the manse's sofa is pretty worrying stuff.

This might explain why we are in such an economic madhouse.

He also seems to take the position that for the Euro to work there must be a single EU country, and seems to suggest that this would be a good thing,
"We have also got this impediment to growth: the euro area is inflexible because you cannot adjust your currency. It is a one-size-fits-all interest rate that doesn't necessarily suit all countries, and the structural reforms that are therefore necessary to make a single currency area work haven't been completed - and in some cases haven't been agreed."

Wednesday, December 08, 2010

Polling ratings: UKIP on 5%

The YouGov poll for last Sunday's Sunday Times makes interesting reading.

Between elections UKIP traditionally hovers around the small, negligable to irrelevant mark. It spikes at election time particularly at EU election time.

However there has never been a time where on a national poll during a thoroughly un-election period that it has reached 5% before. And this comes after polling a healthy 3% only a month ago.

Maybe the Express campaign, the Euro crisis, prisoner votes, knife crime backsliding and all that what have you are having an impact at last.

Wonder what that would do to marginal seats across the country, for whichever party?

Buzek's dreaming

I see that the President of the European Parliament is trying to get down with the kids on his twitter stream today,

That is the slightly thredbare, hippy drippy kids of the 60's and early 70's.

How did Lennon's dream go?

Oh yes,
Imagine there's no countries,
It isn't hard to do
Well I have a dream as well Mr Buzek.

One in which the people of my country get to decide on their own future democratically. Where all the politicians of the countries of Europe respond to the hopes and fears of their people, trade with each other and through trade improve the lots of their lives.

My dream at least is possible. Yours is merely destructive.
British Politics Blog Directory

Twitter