Friday, July 24, 2009

WTF.. Modern Britain

Armed police kick down door.

"Don't worry love, have a glass of whisky"

It's not that they kicked down the door. It's not that they ordered the women out whilst her 6 year old remained in the bath (odd she would be done for neglect for that if not acting under police orders. Should the headline really read. "Armed police order woman to neglect 6 year old"?)

It's the final comment from the plod that worries me,
"Inspector Andy Allkins, of Dorset Police tactical firearms unit, said: “Although routinely armed officers carried out the enquiry, the man sought is not assessed as a danger to the public. Routinely, armed officers in Dorset carry out all those duties performed by their unarmed colleagues.”

Routinely. What!!!

From what I recall routine was that firearms officers were few and far between and fire arms only came out at specific times and with specific requests. Not searching for somebody who isn't even regarded as a danger to the public.

What the hell were they doing in Parkstone tooled up? Where is the police justification for this?

And this comment on the Echo piece gives me the right heeby geebies,
keh2000, Poole says... 8:39am Fri 24 Jul 09
The fact is that armed units are pretty much the only ones free, and with the kit available, to force entry, which is why they were probably used. I've used them to gain access for welfare issues as they were the only officers available at the time, and the fact that they were armed didn't come into it.

For Welfare cases!!!!!!

Norwich North UKIP get 11.8%

A cracking vote for Glen Tingle the UKIP candidate in Norwich North. Despite the BBC's refusla to accpet that we were serous players in the constituency - constantly bring the Greens to the fore, UKIP out campiagned, out voted and out played the Green's confirming our status as Britain's growing force in poltics.

Congratulations Glen and all the team that worked in Norwich

Great day for UKIP

Wonderful election results, and that is before the Norwich results come out,

In Cambridgeshire today UKIP have just scored a double first. Pete Reeve a local activist won both the District Council and County Council seat in Ramsey.

By beating the Tories into second place in the County Election with a whopping 43%, and in the District with 39% up from 22% last year.

Paul Nuttall MEP, UKIP party chairman said, "This shows that with a good candidate and with hard work UKIP are breaking through. Ramsey is in one of the Tory's safest seats and UKIP are, to coin a phrase, "winning here".

"We have never won a County Council by-election, and against a former Council leader and senior figure this is a massive boost. Over the past twelve months our votes have risen in this ward alone 17%. A phenomenal result for Pete and his hard working team"

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

Charles, Charles...

Dear Charles,

Though I recognise the great merit you have produced your latest Facebook update reads welll,

Read it again,

Proud to have just been awarded today the Medal of Mkhitar Gosh by the President of the Republic of Armenia. Look forward to my visit to Yerevan to receive it...

I mean, I know that you were responsible for the revolution in the Ukraine, but wait please, enough trans-caucasian adventures. Who do you think you are? Peter Hopkirk?

Here you are saving the people of Kiev,



Why is this necessary?

The Archbishop Rowan Williams Primary School in Portskewett, Monmouthshire is a little odd for a number of reasons. The front page of its website has a number of photos showing happy little kinder. For example this one,



Obviously engaging in some planet saving activity, all very laudable. But this other one worries me,





Why did the school not feel the need to obscure the faces on the former but to do so in the latter. Is there something intrinsically more prone to peadophile thoughts about being an altar boy/girl?

Should we be worried about the activities of some no doubt blameless priest.

And anyhow why is the school named after the bearded vacuum that currently resides in Lambeth Palace? It's all a tad vainglorious you know. Imagine the scene...

"Your Grace?", says the dean and chapter in plain chant.

"Yes, Jones's"

"Your Grace, we have come up with a way to celebrate the munificence of your arch-episcopate".

"What. A brass plaque on a pew?"

"No, when you leave for Cantebury we shall name that little primary school in Monmouthshire after you?"

"But I am not dead yet", he says as he brushes breakfast egg from his beard.

"To us you are", tugging of multiple forelocks.

"Well damn well make sure there are pictures of priests and chldren at the altar on its website, you know how people talk"

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Mandy ambushed in Norwich

When is gone bust not gone bust?

When a pub suffers from "Enterprise death".

Davis for Freedom, yeah right.

David Davis, MP for Haltemprice and Howden and doughty defender of Liberty (at least that's what his website says) has a curious lacuna. That is anything to do with the European Union. He will stand up and sit down on issues such as 42 day detention, yes. And good for him. He will go to the barricades to oppose Id cards, and so say all of us.

But when it comes to the European Arrest Warrant he goes strangely silent. Today the Law Lords have released their decision on the Symeou case.

In June when the High Court offered the case to the Law Lords everybody felt that at last something would be done to stop Andrew from being extradited. But no. The Law Lords have now shown themselves to be cowards. They have declined the opportunity to defend a British citizen who will now be extradited on the basis of no evidence presented to a British Court.

It is easy to see why this is the case. Obviously they belibve that nmo British citizen should be extradited without evidence being presented. But because the UK has signed up to the European Arrest Warrant, (legislation written by Lib Dem MEP Graham Watson) there is nothing they can do to defend a young Briton's liberty.

At no point in the last 1000 years would we have the situation that we are prepared to hand over a British citizen to a foriegn jurisdiction without evidence. Now we have two cases in as many weeks.

Of course the case of the Pentagon hacker, Gary McKinnon is getting more coverage because it plays into the native anti-American prejudice of the liberal elite in our country, however because this is an EU matter the case is being relegated into a side issue.

Frank Symeou, Andrew's father said this today,
"By fighting Andrew’s extradition to Greece has given us invaluable time.
Considering back in June 2008, when he was arrested, we had no information at all and the past twelve months has given us the opportunity to accumulate, analyse, compare and question evidence.

We have lobbied the Greek Authorities and the Investigating Judge in Zante and presented her with evidence that contradicts statements found in the Greek Police
files.

It has also meant the boys who were beaten by the Zante police and made to sign false statements implicating Andrew, were able to go to Zante and give verbal testimony directly to the Judge officially retracting their previous statements.

They testified how they had been subjected to eight hours of interrogation, threats and abuse; that police officers had slapped and punched them and were made to sign statements that were not true.

Without this extra time Andrew may by now have been in a Greek prison convicted of a crime he did not commit, based on evidence obtained by torture and that had been fabricated and manipulated by the investigating police officers.

Andrew is ready to face his accusers confident in the fact that he is innocent and that the case against him has no foundation in truth.

This whole nightmare has tested Andrew in ways that most of us could not imagine. Yes, it has been extremely difficult for him and the stress has taken its toll, but he has shown great courage and strength of character.

On 23rd July Andrew will be taken under police escort to Heathrow and handed over to Greek Police who will fly him to Greece. The next stage of this terrible ordeal will have begun with no one knowing how it will end.

Logic dictates that the case will be thrown out before even going to trial, but for the past two years it seems logic and common sense has never played a part in these proceedings."
Andrew's laywers tell us, via Fair Trials International, that the prosecuting magistrate goes on holiday on the 8th August. In order to get a bail hearing before that date as much pressure needs to be brought to bear as possible. I ask anybody who cares about justice and British liberty to write to the Greek Embassy here in London at this address,

political@greekembassy.org.uk

or
H.E. Achilleas Vasileious Pistinis
Ambassador of the Hellenic Republic of Greece
1A Holland Park
London,
W11 3TP

or try,
H.E. Dr. David Landesman OBE
Ambassador
The British Embasy
1 Ploutarchou Street
Kolonaki,
Athens
Greece

information.athens@fco.gov.uk

And ask that the bail hearing takes place before the 8th of August or Andrew will spend a long hot summer, in a Greek gaol with no end in sight.

Oh and why David Davis? Because when he launched his campaign he refused to help, when it was brought to his attention on Question Time, he didn't engage. When we asked him today to help the message came back that he was too busy, but if we sent the details he might look at it over the next few days.

Not ruddy good enough. This case has been rolling through for 18 months and more. Davis has known about it all the way, but has refused to lift a finger. We in UKIP know (and it is the London UKIP MEP Gerard Batten who has done more to highlight this case than anybody else) that is Davis was to make a statement the press would take notice. But he cannot be arsed to lift a finger to defend British liberties against EU regulation.

So be it, you lazy, good for nothing, preening hypocrite. Stop grand-standing about freedom when you refuse to act to defend it.

It looks like there will be more bears in the Med

This is the sort of thing that should set the newspapers flapping, or at least their foriegn desks.
Russia is set to expand and modernize its Soviet-era naval facilities near Tartus in Syria to support anti-piracy missions off the Somali coast.

This is a ase that was abandoned in 1991, but has seen a recent visits from the Russian carrier the “Admiral Kuznetsov” with an escort fleet, (having harrased Norwegian gas feilds) giving testament to the Syrian port's capacity. With Ukraine particularly antsy about the continued presence of the Black Sea at Sevastopol in the Crimea, talks of a base in Lybia and the Russian functional control of Algeria's gas industry this will give the Bear the sort of strategic capacity that the Tsars could only dream of.

Rather charmingly the EU last week was talking about gas supply as currently about 25% of its energy needs come from gas, a percentage rapidly increasing, whilst 58% of that comes from Russia. The EU notes that other safer sources include Norway, Lybia and Algeria. Well that's alright then.

Any mention in the British press? No, of course not.

Says it all

In a comment on the Times' piece on the Norwich election on Thursday I read this from one
Jonathan Foster,
i fail to see why anyone would vote for the main three. they are all out of touch, they all lack vision and all three have MP's with their snouts in the trough. I want an end to politicans trying to be appealing by cuddling babies in africa, shaking hands with soldiers hundreds of miles away from the frontline and going back to being boring old men talking about policies.
I cannot but agree

Friday, July 17, 2009

The Hairy Moneyball strikes again

What is wrong with socialists? No really, what is wrong with them? Why cannot they laugh?

Trixy has picked up this little number from Mary Honeyball's blog.

Yesterday UKRep, the UK Permanent Representation to the European Union, held their traditional reception to welcome British MEPs to the European Parliament. It was, for me, a deeply depressing experience. Not only were most of the UKIP MEPs present; they were also accompanied by young women in fairly flimsy purple dresses... It brought home to me just how far Britain has moved away from support for Europe
I am not sure what depressed her most. The slow realisation that the people of Britain no longer want to play the great European game, or the fact that the UKIP MEP's were accompanied by attractive women.

It reminds me of a passage in Republican Party Reptile. PJ O'Rourke is looking at some demo out of his window, feeling a little nostalgic about his days demonstrating in the 60's. The crowd outside were uniformly ugly, and the demo was not a success. He then remembered that having young attractive women on your side was a sign that your cause was likely to win.

Here is Ms. Honeyball


And here is one of the girls she is talking about


Who would you invite to a party?

Update

Iain Dale joins the chorus of contempt, rightly taking her to task for crap statistics,

"Over a million construction workers are set to work on the site over the next
three years"

A million!!! You what?

Something just typical about this

Here is some Commission document, detailing discussions about Customs code and tarriff rates. Down near the bottom of the document is this priceless note

Article 15
Transparency
1. The principles and conditions concerning public access to the Committee's documents shall be the same as those defined in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 200116. It is for the Commission to take a decision on requests for access to these documents. If the request is addressed to a Member State, that Member State shall apply Article 5 of the abovementionedRegulation.
2. The Committee's discussions shall be kept confidential.

My italics

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Farage on the Czech Presidency



What Mr Barroso forgets of course is that the Treaty takes the flag away, in order to get the Dutch to refuse a second referendum. So why is he flying that flag?

Oopps and double oops

Further to the Tory European group train crash, Tory spinners are claiming that everything is fine... Yeah right.

I spoke to Kaminski this morning. He was a little embarrased by what had happened, but he pointed out that rather than behave so honourably Kirkhope had tried to salvage some pride by offering a joint Presidency. Kaminski turned this offer down, he felt that he had worked over the years for a Tory EP grouping (true) and the Poles had upheld their part of the bargin They had found themselves in the UEN group in 2004 because they had been promised that the Tories would leave the EPP-ED at that time and had been left high and dry with nowhere to go). To be offered a joint chairmanship was felt to be insulting.
He had his name put forward. In the Group meeting that followed a number of Tory MEPs then openly declared that they would support Kaminski's candidacy and Kirkhope did the maths, realised that he would lose the vote and stood down.
The fact is that at the present time the Tories are trusted by nobody in or out of the ECR group. They failed in their promise because they had no discipoline and they are left with nobody on the top table of the Parliament (the Bureau). Nobody in Strasbourg is pretending that this is anything but a disaster for the new group.
Then of course we have the problem within the delegation. The idea was Kirkhope would become ECR Chairman. This would lead to him standing down as delegation Chairman. Of course this would mean that Harbour or Van Orden would stand for delegation chairman. This can no longer happen as the position ante is still extant. Thus we now have thwarted ambition in the Tory delegation - always a fun ingredient to throw into any soup. There will now be an election for Tory delegation Chairman in November and noises off are telling me that it is expected to be one serious cat-fight. Fur will be flying and tickets will be sold for ringside seats.

Bright beautiful new morning

So my comments yesterday about the troubles in the new Tory ECR Group were nothing on what really happened. All yesterday evening I was trying to get a steer on what was happening within their group following Edward MacMillan-Scot's auto-defenestration, and there were reams of silence. Unanswered texts, phones pointedly unpicked up, mubles and delays.

What was going on?

Well in brief this...

EMS's vainglorious independent candidacy for European Parliament Vice-Presidency was sucesful. This unpicked the deal which had been the foundation of the new Group, that is the Poles of the PiS get the VP job and the Tories get the leadership of the Group. EMS did this despite threats (now carried out) that he would lose the Tory whip.

This enraged the Poles, despite desperate attempts by Tory staffers who were spinning that EMS's candidacy was all about the Germans getting pissed of with Sylvana Koch-Mehlin's . The photogenic Sylvana is getting too much publicity they say, she is unimportant (being from the small free-trading, atlanticist Free Democrat Party) whilst far more important and visuallly chalenged German MEP's do not attract the press attention.

Anyhow this obviously didn't wash with the Poles who then had the temerity to gather together and nominate Mick Kaminski (the failed VP candidate) to stand against Timothy Kirkhope as Group leader.

Kaminski, a long time friend of the Tory Eurosceptics in Brussels collected the support of at least ten of the Tories and thus defeated Tory wet Kirkhope.

One grinning all over his face turned to me this morning and said,

"At least we have a Conservative as Group leader".
That is all very well, and I like Mick, but it means that the Tories having set up their group now have failed to pick up either of the posts that gives them acess to the Parliament's top table of the Bureau.

Mark Francois , (the shadow Europe Minister) may well have phoned Mick to offer his congratulations but the Tory high comand must be livid. Their plans have gone spectacularly awry. And it is only day one of the new Group.

Worse still, from what I hear, MacMillan-Scott is boasting that he is going to cause even more trouble by revealing more revalations about the PiS (homophobic stuff maybe).

How we all laughed last night as Robert Sturdy arrived to enjoy Bastille day drinks and pulled his finger across his throat with a grimace.

The picture illustrates Nigel Farage and Jan Zahradhil (ODS). Zarahdil is sitting in the seat that Mr Kirkhope thought had his name on it at the front of the chamber.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Others thoughts

This was sent to me, and though I rarely do this, this time I reproduce it.

The average age of the military man is 19 years. He is a short haired, tight-muscled kid who, under normal circumstances is considered by society as half man, half boy. Not yet dry behind the ears, just old enough to buy a beer, but old enough to die for his country. He never really cared much for work and he would rather wax his own car than wash his father's, but he has never collected unemployment either.

He's a recent Comprehensive School graduate; he was probably an average student, pursued some form of sport activities, drives a ten year old jalopy, and has a steady girlfriend that either broke up with him when he left, or swears to be waiting when he returns from half a world away. He listens to rock and roll or hip-hop or rap or jazz or swing and a 155mm howitzer.

He is 10 or 15 pounds lighter now than when he was at home because he is working or fighting from before dawn to well after dusk. He has trouble spelling, thus letter writing is a pain for him, but he can field strip a rifle in 30 seconds and reassemble it in less time in the dark. He can recite to you the nomenclature of a machine gun or grenade launcher and use either one effectively if he must.

He digs foxholes and latrines and can apply first aid like a professional.

He can march until he is told to stop, or stop until he is told to march.

He obeys orders instantly and without hesitation, but he is not without spirit or individual dignity. He is self-sufficient.

He has two sets of fatigues: he washes one and wears the other. He keeps his canteens full and his feet dry.

He sometimes forgets to brush his teeth, but never to clean his rifle. He can cook his own meals, mend his own clothes, and fix his own hurts.

If you're thirsty, he'll share his water with you; if you are hungry, his food. He'll even split his ammunition with you in the midst of battle when you run low.He has learned to use his hands like weapons and weapons like they were his hands.He can save your life - or take it, because that is his job.

He will often do twice the work of a civilian, draw half the pay, and still find ironic humour in it all.

He has seen more suffering and death than he should have in his short lifetime.

He has wept in public and in private, for friends who have fallen in combat and is unashamed.

He feels every note of the National Anthem vibrate through his body while at rigid attention, while tempering the burning desire to 'square-away' those around him who haven't bothered to stand, remove their hat, or even stop talking.

In an odd twist, day in and day out, far from home, he defends their right to be disrespectful.Just as did his Father, Grandfather, and Great-grandfather, he is paying the price for our freedom. Beardless or not, he is not a boy. He is the BRITISH Fighting Man that has kept this country free for over 200 years.He has asked nothing in return, except our friendship and understanding.

Remember him, always, for he has earned our respect and admiration with his blood.And now we even have women over there in danger, doing their part in this tradition of going to War when our nation calls us to do so.

Prayer wheel for our military...

Prayer Wheel

"Lord, hold our troops in your loving hands.
Protect them as they protect us.
Bless them and their families for the selfless acts they perform for us in our time of need.

Amen.'


When you read this, please stop for a moment and say a prayer for our ground troops inAfghanistan, sailors on ships, and airmen in the air, and for those in Iraq .

Of all the gifts you could give a British Soldier, Sailor,or Airman, prayer is the very best one.

First cracks in the new Tory Group

I have speculatedthat the new European Parliament Grouping of the Tories, the Conservative and Reformist Group (CRG) is going to find life a little dificult.

They have been used to a big group where a little differences are generally hidden and the size of the group creates ts own gravity, keeping people within the group's orbit. They have no experience of the nips and tucks of group management. If they loose two sub groups then their experiment of non EPP membership will end in embarrasing disastor.

So it is with interest that the first cracks are showing.

Today the nominations for the Vice-Presidents of Parliament close (The President will be decided by annointation as the choice is a toss up between Jerzy Buzek (seen wandering around his new empire on Sunday this weekend- trying it out for size) of the EPP and some Communist).

The CRG is getting a Tory as the Group leaders - with a place on the Conference of Presidents and the parliament's Bureau as goodies) - a minor battle between Geoffrey Vin Ordinaire and the plodding Timothy Kirkhope. However the deal cut with the Polish PiS is that their nomibnation gets the VP post.

Not if last term's EP V-P, Edward MacMillan-Scott is very unhappy about this - claiming that there was no vote and no doubt wiffling on about lack of democracy in the Group. Really he despises the new Group, is happy to bugger it up and suffers from a serious degree of political vanity.

He has collected the required signatures and believes that in a contested election (there is one more candidate than VP slot) he will beat the CRG official Pole.

This will set the first of many many headaches for Van Kirkhope to cauterise in maintaining the impression that everything is fine.

It isn't and even a casual observer knows that.

Saturday, July 11, 2009

Aluminum hats or legitimate concern

Quentin Letts in the Mail today poses an interesting question.


The Government states that European Union membership is in the national interest. UKIP disagrees. Might not MI5, applying logic, therefore say it should put a tail on UKIP's wilder elements?
Now nobody is going to deny that all parties have 'wilder elements' and UKIP is not immune, however that would not excuse MI5 interest. Indeed keeping tabs on the wilder one would be pointless. Listening in to some of UKIP's finest over a pint of Old Kneecracker down the King's Head planing to make a latter day reprise of Guy Fawkes seems to me to be a waste of resources, particularly in these times of a homegrown islamacist threat. Surely other more valid and sensible threats exist? Farage for example, cripes even myself (not regarding myself as 'wild' in the slightest. Lord Pearson, who occaisioned this article would no doubt be the the perfect target and is an obvious revolutionary. Here is the question,


"6 July 2009 : Column WA118

UK Independence Party
Questions

Asked by Lord Pearson of Rannoch

To ask Her Majesty's Government further to the Written Answer by Lord West of Spithead on 10 June (WA 151), whether the Security Service has been or is active inside or towards the United Kingdom Independence Party or any of its members. [HL4590]

To ask Her Majesty's Government further to the Written Answer by Lord West of Spithead on 10 June (WA 151), whether the security services or the police have collaborated or are collaborating with the European Anti-Fraud Office or any other organ of the European Union in relation to the United Kingdom Independence Party or any of its members. [HL4591]

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the Security Service has investigated or is engaged with the United Kingdom Independence Party. [HL4592]
And here the answer,

The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord West of Spithead): The established policy of successive Governments is not to comment on questionsabout Security Service investigations.

The Security Service Act 1989 sets out its functions and prohibits it doing anything in furtherance of the interests of a political party. It does not investigate anyone for being a member of a campaigning organisation.

Police operations are a matter for the relevant chief officer who is under no duty to report such matters to the Government.
Of course thisis not the first time that these questions have been asked, back in 2001 Lord Tebbit posed similar questions in a Spectator article that seems to have dissapeared, though not references to it.

The point is, as lets makes clear, MI5 works in the 'national interest' as defined by HMG. EU membership is in the national interest accordng to HMG, UKIP is a political party, not a 'campaigning organisation', and denying that MI5 works to further "the interests of a political party" seems frankly bizzare, as that should be so self evident as to be redundent.

Lord West's answer therefore raises far more questions than I am personally comfortable with.

Friday, July 10, 2009

Deluded perchance?

One pof the most fascinatingthings about politicians is their ability to see the world through their own spectacles, and not allow brute reality to impinge upon them. Thus it is with Martin Schulz, leader off the socialist group which we must learn to call, at least for the next week the "Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament".

Here he is about the sucess of the Group in last month's elections,

the group has gone from holding approximately 27.5% of the seats in the outgoing Parliament to around 25.8% of the seats in the new Parliament.

According to Martin Schulz, it is therefore a "marginal decline" for the second largest group and the only one with MEPs from all 27 Member States. Its power is still "practically identical," and without it "the formation of a democratic and social coalition is not possible."

With only 25% of seats other coalitions are indeed possible. However best of all is the following,
"I am working extremely hard to hold back the 27 heads of state or government."
Guffaw, chortle, gasp. Oh yes Martin, Angela, Nicolas and the crew are going to take a blind bit of notice of a failed-burgomeister style, arm-waving auto-dictat whose group got womped in the elctions.

Nah, don't think so. The chilled towels are kept over there on the sideboard, why don't you go and get one?

Lies, dammit lies, well maybe not

The European parliament has got itself into a tizzy about a story that made it into the News of the World last Sunday.

Somehow Parliament Bureau documents from June had made into the hands of the Screws and they documented quite how much money the new President of Parliament was to receive,


"THE next European Parliament president is set to get an EXTRA £113,016 to rent a home PLUS £43,704 for entertaining on TOP of the current £36,778-a-year living allowance."
So we made it clear that we didn't like it,

The leaked document, uncovered by the UK Independence Party, says the changes will put the president in the same pay bracket as the head of the European Commission, who is in charge of the EU's day-to-day running.

UKIP MEP Marta Andreasen said: "The political elite think these obscene sums should be thrown at their feet without any thought of the people that pay for their feather-bedded lifestyle - the taxpayers."

The response though seem a little confused, I will add it in full,

Parliamentary bosses have angrily hit out at a UK tabloid's claims that the next president is in line for a "massive" pay increase.

According to the News of the World newspaper, the president is set to gain an extra €130,000 per year to rent a home plus €49,000 for entertaining on top of the current €41,000 living allowance.

The planned €180,000 pay rise is detailed, said the paper, in "secret EU documents" and is designed to give the president "more dignity."

The pay rise, it says, would make his total yearly income about €247,000 and put the president in the same pay bracket as the president of the commission.

Former Polish PM Jerzy Buzek is next week expected to be approved as parliament's next president, taking over from German deputy Hans-Gert Pöttering.

However, a parliament spokeswoman said there was "no truth whatsoever" in the story.

She told this website, "We do not know where they have got these figures from and it is incorrect to say the president is in line for a 'massive' pay rise. The allegations are utterly unfounded.

"There was, some time back, a possible proposal tabled which may have led to changes in the president's financial arrangements but this is not going ahead now."

She added, "It is possible legal action could have been taken in relation to this story but we have looked at this in the past and I am afraid it is not a viable option."

Well the figures (10,990 euros pcm for housing and 4,250 pcm for entertainments) came from the Bureau "summary of decisions" document, item 6, dated June 2009, which are not yet available in the intranet of the Parliament. So yes she does know where they came from.

"Some time back", suggests years, not less than a month. I had breakfast "some time back", but I would be dissembling if I said that to a journalist.

"no truth whatsoever" she says, " The allegations are utterly unfounded" she says.

Liar I say.

If she is telling the truth why does she then admit that "There was... a possible proposal tabled which may have led to changes in the president's financial arrangements but this is not going ahead now", what since the publication of the article?

Shall we see how the final published minutes are massaged shall we, wonder if the recordings of the meeting have been changed too?

And if legal action was looked into - get real - why was it decided against, because the story was true?

It's shooting fish in a barrel.


Update
I have just received an anonymous note corerdcting this piece.

"The paragraphe in the Bureau document presented the currant situation which has been the the case since 1991. The president gets every three months (trimenstrel) the per diem for every calander day, an allowance for housing and an allowance for entertainment. The 2009 figures are 298 euros for the per diem, 10,990 euros for housing and 4,250 euros for entertainments. Total = 90 days x 298 + 10990 + 4250 = 42000 euros. Or about 170,000 euros a year. So Poettering got about 400,000 during his two and a halve years as President.

the porte parole of the parliament is technically correct to say that it is untrue that increases are planned for the President. The new president will simply get what every president has got in the past. The Bureau document was about extending parts (but not all) of the president's package to vice-presidents and group presidents. This was rejected by the Bureau".
So I apologise for my inaccuracy, and I suppose we must be grateful for small mercies that they didn't extend the package. Astonishing that they considered it. But this confirms the great wodges of wonga dissapearing into the president's maw.




British Politics Blog Directory