Europe's imperial arrogance

The long history of Turkey's attempt to join the European Union has been fraught with misunderstanding, anger and bad will over the years. The hoops expected of the Turks have been smaller and smaller. Ever since 1963 when Turkey first became an associate member the promise of membership has been dangled with increasing demands.

Today the EU surpassed itself.

Turkey must coordinate its foreign policy with the European Union, the bloc’s executive warned on Tuesday as it presented its annual report on the country’s progress towards EU membership.

In the report itself it says,

"Turkey has achieved a high level of alignment in the area of external relations. However, further work remains to be done in many areas, in particular on the general system of
preferences with regard to its geographical coverage".

Turkey has its sphere of influence in the Turkic nations, and Europe has hers. From what the EU is saying now they seem to think that what's theirs is theirs, and what is Turkey's is theirs too. How very 19th Century.

Others have learnt not to push Mehmet around.

There is austerity, and then there is austerity

Austerity begins at home, as well we know. But obviously not of you are one the the EU's new diplomats.

Here is the tender offer for furniture for our new diplomatic corps, the EEAS. Not you will be interested to note for the Embassies themselves. Oh no, not that, but more for the residences of our pampered plenipotentiaries,

Purchase of top-of-the-range furniture for the residences of ambassadors-heads of delegation of the European Union

The bill is estimated at 8,000,000 Euros.

Now there are 130 current EU delegations/embassies around trhe world, which would mean that this largesse could be split at just over 61,000 Euros per country. But, but. Many of these countries, indeed all of them are already in offices, and already have furniture - indeed a frienmd went out to one a year or so ago.
And surely they weill be spending more on the prestige places such as Washington with Barosso's chum the reprehensible Joao Vale De Almedia, rather than the more, shall we say hardship posts like Cape Verde, where Josep Coll I Carbo holds the fort. Still, a lot of cash per residence I would say.

Also interesting is that this website is an official Belarusian Government website, encouraging Belarusian's to compete for the contract.

The EU's version is here

"Brussels will become the diplomatic capital of Europe"

So said Robert Cooper today at a conference organised by the University of Kent's Brussels offshoot the Brussels School of International Studies.

Cooper, is the Director General, General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union and author of the groundbreaking book, 'The Breaking of Nations'. He was discussing the role of the new EU Diplomatic corps, the European External Action Service (EEAS).

This body which though already extant in a fledgling form exists through the Lisbon Treaty cum Constitution via 13a-III:

In fulfilling his or her mandate, the High Representative shall be assisted by a European External Action Service. This service shall work in cooperation with the diplomatic services of the Member States and shall comprise officials from relevant departments of the General Secretariat of the Council and of the Commission as well as staff seconded from national diplomatic services of the Member States. The organisation and functioning of the European External Action Service shall be established by a decision of the Council. The Council shall act on a proposal from the High Representative after consulting the European Parliament and after obtaining the consent of the Commission.

His point was that the EEAS would provide a valuable function in the operation of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (EFSP). Currently at the Council you have 27 countries with 27 sets of national interests. For there to be an effective foreign policy somebody has to take the lead, to make proposals. However under the current national based system one country will always discount another countries approach. "The European Commission would be unacceptable", he said, but with the coming into force of the Lisbon Treaty, "The External Action Service will be the body that puts proposals onto the table. The result will be that Brussels will become trhe diplomatic capital of Europe."

In the Question and Answer session afterwards I picked this up as I was aware that Hans-Gert Pöttering had set up a mandated negotiation team made up of key federasts to discuss the subject, as reported by Bruno Waterfield in the Daily Telegraph. This team of Enrico Baron Crespo, Elmar Brok, Andrew Duff and Dagmar Roth-Berendt MEPs had been mandated by Poettering to demand that the Parliament shopuld have "proper hearings of the special representatives and ambassadorial nominees in the tradition of the US Congress for nominations of a clearly political nature" and to ensure that, "Any inter-governmentalism of policy areas under Community competence" should "be avaoided".

Was Cooper "happy with this idea", I asked "that the Parliament should hold hearings to make or break ambassadorial appointments for the EU?"

In a general sense he was, he thought that the quality of Congressional and Senate scrutiny was something that the European Parliament should aspire to "The Parliament still hasn't worked out what it is for", he said. Hearings could be something that they could do. But he added a worrying and in my view insurmountable caveat.

"Provided that it acts responsibly," by this he meant that hearings would be a good idea if they were on a bilateral basis. However, "If we end up with ambassadors who are solely picked on the basis of political policies then that would be the ruin for us".

Later over sandwiches I came back to him on this, pointing out that since the rejection of Rocco Butiglione on party political grounds and the growth of European Political Parties and the natural desire of those granted electoral success to want to take control of all aspects of governance then the EEAS was under his own terms guaranteed to be a "ruin". Well that relies on the qualities of the MEPs he went on to say.

You can see from the expression our faces what we thought of that idea. And it seems that he is fan of at least one of the mandated MEPs.

On other areas of policy he was equally revealing. On being asked about the rising power of Russia and Europe's policy towards Russia he put it like this,

"Does the UK currently have a policy towards Russia? The answer is it is 'very complicated'.

Does the EU have a policy towards Russia? The answer is that it is 'even more complicated than that'...

However, the EU needs an Energy Policy. If we have an energy policy we will therefore have a Russia policy"

Not very encouraging.