Platitudes heaped on dishonesty

David Cameron is "angry" and has let it be known "in no uncertain terms" that one of his peers spoke his mind. At no time does it appear that boy consider that what Lord Mancroft had said was empirical truth. What is important is that it should not have been said.

Cameron was talking today in Wales when he rounded on the peer after Mancroft had described the nurses that he had experienced whilst in hospital recently in a speech in the Lords,

"The nurses, who probably are the most important people in this complex area, were what I would describe as an accurate reflection of many young women in Britain today. What do I mean by that? I shall now break your Lordships’ rules and read the next bit, because I thought very hard before I wrote it. The nurses who looked after me—not all of them; we should never generalise and there were one or two wonderful ones—were mostly grubby, with dirty fingernails and hair. They were slipshod, lazy and, worst of all, drunken and promiscuous. How do I know that? If you are a patient, lying in a bed and being nursed from either side, the nurses talk across you as if you are not there. I know exactly what they got up to the night before. I know how much they drank and what they were planning to do the next night, and it was pretty horrifying".

The fact that Mancroft is a decent civilised man with a long and nationally recognised interest in health issues is of course unimportant. The fact that from the speech in its entirety it is obvious that he was not speaking from malice, but from deep concern.

But that is unacceptable in Cameron world. The empirical evidence of your own eyes is as nothing next to the repetition of polite nostrums and political shibboleths. Nurses are 'angels of mercy' particularly if they work in the state sector. Contrary evidence must not be aired and the public must never be informed that things are not perfectly rosey inthe garden.

After all if they were, or more to the point if the elite admitted it there would be demands from the people these services are supposed to be provided for, for far more radical solutions than those on offer. Solutions that none in the big three are prepared to contemplate.

That Mr Cameron's speech was about "Mending broken politics", makes me laugh.

He said there was a breakdown of public faith in the political system, with a need to end spin, directly engage the public and "mend broken politics".

Directly engaging with reality would be exactly how to start the process, but acording to him to do so makes him angry.

Pot... Kettle

So the Boy Dave has fired all his load at the Prime Minister on the great transparency issue.

Could he then explain how it is that only 13 of his MEPs have come clean about who they employ as assistants with the Parliamentary assistant's allowance.

Furthermore could he tell the 14 who refuse to answer journalists questions to get off their sorry arses and realise that the public have a right to know?

What a horrifying thought

From Peter Briffa I bring you this comment on the Ming Campbell departure.

"David Cameron is now our most experienced party leader".

Dave and the Europeans

Richard over at EUReferendum takes a couple of pot shots at tomorrow's mini conference in Brussels. And even Tory Diary has its doubts.

This is it. This is the great statement on Europe that will ensure that those of a sceptic disposition keep the faith with Dave and chums.

So what are they getting for their money?
Here is the Conference introduction,

Fifty years ago, a generation joined together to lay the foundations for the European Union. It was their response to the urgent challenges they faced: a divided Continent; economies ruined by war.

OK, but meaningless waffle.

Now it is our generation’s turn to lead. We welcome this opportunity, and we want to create a Europe that people can be proud of. But the Europe we are inheriting has become too inward-looking and inflexible, and is losing peoples’ trust. The EU needs to change if it is to be a force for good in the world in the 21st century.

A Europe that people can be proud of. Admirable. Europe is inward-looking and inflexible! You don't say.

Twenty seven member states must now decide what we want ‘European Union’ to mean. When should states act together, and when are they more effective – and better off – acting independently? In the age of globalisation, how should the EU add value?

Sounding a little better, though taking it as read that the EU is necessary. So are there any areas that are to be discussed where the great Dave believes we are better of alone?

Many of the challenges we face today are global: competition from emerging economies, environmental and energy concerns, millions locked in poverty in the developing world. The EU’s response to these challenges will determine its success in the future. Today’s conference will examine these issues and begin the process of charting an exciting new course for Europe’s future.

Aha, so the areas that the EU itself has chosen as its integrationist battle ground, the areas where the Eurocracy has defined as the key areas where their argument works best, Competition, Energy, Environment and Development. So I take it not in those areas.

We are delighted that so many leading commentators, business people, politicians, activists and young people will be taking part.

I shall report back about how many of these glorious figures actually attend.

It is because we believe the European Union has such an important role to play that we want to assess its strengths and weaknesses and develop a new, positive agenda. Join us in building an EU that we can all be proud of.

Please note, "we believe the European Union has such an important role to play"

It’s time for a new agenda.

David Cameron, Mirek Topolánek

Key speakers will include,Mahi Sideridou, the Deputy Director of Greenpeace Europe and Greenpeace’s EU climate and energy Policy Director.
A recent comment from this fine lady is the following,
"The March Summit will need to rectify the gap between what the EU recognises it must do to protect us from the worse impacts of climate change and what it is prepared to commit to doing now: EU leaders must support a 30% unilateral domestic EU reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020,"

James Cameron of Climate Change Capital.
A comment from a website of which he is the boss comes up with this corker,
"Hey hotshot, do you really need to fly to that meeting? Do you really need to holiday abroad? And those relatives across the world - if they really loved you, wouldn't they move closer?"
What an arrogant tosser.

And then there is the film Black Gold

Essentially, twee and meaningless, the Conference should be a bundle of fun.