The European Commission has just launched its latest call for tenders,
FP7-ENV-2011Yes they are just about to hand out €155 million - about £130 million, of our money. And what pray do you have to do to get your mits on this cash?
EPSS is now available for this call for proposals
Publication Date: 20 July 2010
Budget: € 155 000 000
Deadline: 16 November 2010 at 17:00:00 (Brussels local time)
Well your project just needs to fit into this list of possibilities,
There are of course other things you might want to do, but here is the overview (emphasis mine).
Activity 6.1 Climate Change, pollution and risks
Sub-Activity 6.1.1 Pressures on environment and climate
Area 18.104.22.168 The Earth System and Climate: Functioning and abrupt changes
Area 22.214.171.124 Emissions and pressures: Natural and anthropogenic
Area 126.96.36.199 The Global Carbon Cycle - greenhouse gas budgets
Area 188.8.131.52 Future climate
Area 184.108.40.206 Climate change natural and socio-economic impacts
Area 220.127.116.11 Response strategies: adaptation, mitigation and policies
Area 18.104.22.168 Health impacts of climate change
Area 22.214.171.124 Health effects of environmental stressors other than climate
Area 126.96.36.199 Methods and decision support tools for environmental health
risk analysis and policy development
Now one of the fun things about EU funding is that it requires match funding generally of at least 40%. Now if we are talking £130 million on this tranche alone that will require match funding of over £50 million - which will come from - well yes mostly from national Government funds.
Objective of the Environment Theme (according to FP7 Specific Programme for 'Cooperation'):
To promote sustainable management of the natural and human environment and its resources by advancing our knowledge on the interactions between the biosphere, ecosystems and human activities, and developing new technologies, tools and services, in order to address in an integrated way global environmental issues. Emphasis will be put on prediction of climate, ecological, earth and ocean systems changes, on tools and on technologies for monitoring, prevention and mitigation of environmental pressures and risks including on health and for the sustainability of the natural and man-made environment.
So when I read, as I did recently that evil oil companies were putting upwards of $1 million into climate sceptic organisations (front page banner headlines in the Times) I start to think, its not really in the same ball park is it?
As Richard North has pointed out before and John Rosenthal has done recently after a while you start to be talking serious money. All paid for by you and me.
Generous aren't we?