Sunday, November 05, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Foools, deluded fools
Places I go
-
-
-
-
Compared to is always interesting10 hours ago
-
-
-
-
Happy Trooping the Colour!9 months ago
-
-
-
AdSense became unusable2 years ago
-
-
Liberum veto curse2 years ago
-
-
Markets.com Review3 years ago
-
NHS Fail Wail3 years ago
-
-
-
2 frau 1 cup xxx5 years ago
-
Merry Christmas: Joy To The World6 years ago
-
A clattering of Jackdaws.6 years ago
-
Schäublenomics6 years ago
-
Brexit: it's not about the prices7 years ago
-
How convenient7 years ago
-
-
For Sale8 years ago
-
-
-
Enfant de la Patrie9 years ago
-
Canon Andrew White deserves a knighthood9 years ago
-
That’s all folks9 years ago
-
-
Newslinks for Sunday 22nd September 201310 years ago
-
-
Sky TV, Oxford and Prisons11 years ago
-
Blogging Off11 years ago
-
-
Barnsley13 years ago
-
Well Done UKIP Glasgow.13 years ago
-
The last post13 years ago
-
The end of summertime?13 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4 comments:
I'd always thought that euthanasia involved someone choosing to die. Surely, when you choose that someone else should die, it is called something rather different.
I've seen someone, a medic, make that choice, to let a child born badly disabled die. She chose to do it to save the opportunities of its siblings, who, due to medical bills that would have occured, would not have benefited from education they would otherwise have had. (This was West Africa).
It was the most noble thing I've ever seen anyone do. She cried for days. I honour and admire her for taking the hard decision, and the responsibility, when the chips were down. And I hope that in the same circumstances I would be just like her.
wouldn't it be better if we simply fed them to the poor instead?
How our age declines: from the oath of Hipoccrates to the oath of Mengele.
Post a Comment